PEER RATING OF LAB TEAM MEMBERS
Name_____________________________
Team______________________________
On this form you are to assess the degree to which each team member fulfilled
his/her responsibilities in completing this laboratory project. Use
the verbal rating scale below. Submit this report to the EE office.
Information on this report is confidential.
-
Excellent
-
Consistently performed at a level above and
beyond, carried more than a fair share of the load and shared knowledge
with teammates.
-
Very Good
-
Consistently performed her/his role, very well
prepared and cooperative.
-
Satisfactory
-
Usually performed her/his role, satisfactorily
prepared and cooperative.
-
Ordinary
-
Often performed his/her role, minimally prepared
and cooperative.
-
Marginal
-
Sometimes failed to show up or complete her/his
part of the project, rarely prepared.
-
Deficient
-
Often failed to show up or complete his/her
part of the project, rarely prepared.
-
Unsatisfactory
-
Usually failed to show up or complete her/his
part of the project, unprepared.
-
Superficial
-
Practically no participation (i.e. superficial
participation).
-
No Show
Your ratings should reflect each person's level
of participation, effort and sense of responsibility in his/her role, and
should not reflect that person's academic ability. Do not rate yourself.
|
Role
|
Team Member
|
Rating
(Use terms above)
|
Group Coordinator
|
|
|
Technical Resource
|
|
|
Data Analyst
|
|
|
Editor
|
|
|