FOUN 98–Evolutionary Fictions—Rickard—Reaction Paper Assignment

"What really knocks me out is a book that, when you're all done reading it, you wish the author that wrote it was a terrific friend of yours and you could call him up on the phone whenever you felt like it."

–Holden Caulfield, The Catcher in the Rye

Each of you will present one "reaction paper" to the class on a date selected from the online schedule.

We will use your reaction papers to begin discussion of the work you have selected. You must hand the reaction paper in to me after you have read or presented it to the class.

Be sure to use the title of the literary work and the author's name in your title. Please put a date on the paper. Papers should be at least two double-spaced pages long. Your response should be thoughtful and articulate; the more specific and thought-provoking you are, the more useful your reaction paper will be for generating discussion. Reaction papers should: 1) NOT be summaries, and 2) provide at least one question or "starting point" for discussion of the story. The following "models" are suggestions that may help you frame a good reaction paper (you do not have to follow any of these suggestions if you have another idea you like better):

1. Use the following questions to stimulate your thinking about the work you've just finished reading. Then write your paper responding honestly to any one question, several of them, or all of them–whatever you find most appropriate in light of your own reading and thinking:

What were my expectations of this work?

Were these expectations met, disappointed, or exceeded? How? Why?

What was most interesting to me about the story? Why?

Was there anything especially remarkable about the style or presentation?

Would I recommend this work to other readers? Who? Why?

Did this work change my mind about anything?

Did this work remind me of other literary works, films, etc.?

2. Pick a short passage from the work and quote it. Then explain what words in that passage are most important and why. Discuss what you do not understand about the quoted passage or what you found compelling about it. Explore the relationship of this passage to another story we have read or to some event, idea or problem you may have encountered outside of this course.

3. Focus on a literary element–character, conflict, plot, setting, point of view, theme, symbol, etc., but do not present a traditional literary analysis of this element; instead, focus on your reactions to the author's use of this element. Pose questions about this element in the work under consideration and attempt to answer your own questions. Explain how this element of the story makes you feel. For example, in the course of your reading, did you change your mind about a character? (Don't forget to keep minor characters in mind, as well). Do not simply analyze this element as you would in a typical English paper!

4. Respond as Holden Caulfield suggests. Write the phone conversation you would have with the author or write the author a letter.

You are free to come up with your own strategy for developing your reaction paper. Start with your honest reaction and then try to figure out why you reacted the way you did. Remember that organization of ideas, clarity of expression, and overall coherence are principles of a good paper regardless of the model employed. Remember also to support your views with specific references to the text.

A Reaction Paper is NOT a summary!

A Reaction Paper is NOT a detailed, passionless analysis!